![]() |
||
| |
||
| Winter 1996 | ||
| |
|
|
| Featuring: | ||||||
| BPX Alaska Northstar | New Joint Venture | New Dutch Office | Note from the President | Subsea News | ||
| IN-SIDE-TEC | News From INTEC (SEA) | In-House Lectures | Awards Past Quarter | INTEC Anniversaries | ||
| |
||
| |
||
| |
||
| A Note from the President | ||
At a recent offshore pipeline conference in Amsterdam, a fellow engineer implored a gathering of oil industry representatives to resist the habit of over-emphasizing price when selecting engineering services, and relieve the downward pressure on rates. While I share his concern, I also believe that we as engineers can do more to help those who use our service to judge its value. Development of an engineering solution should be valued based on the contribution it makes to the return on our Clients investments. When we are asked to bid on a defined engineering task, someone has already decided what the solution is to their problem, and wants an engineer to work out the details. To the buyer of the services, the greatest benefit to his bottom line, at this point, is getting the service at the lowest price. This is the unfortunate situation about which my industry friend was commiserating.
We often find, however, that the problem we are asked to solve is only a symptom, and not the real issue, and that we can achieve a greater return on a Clients investment if we are given an opportunity to address the broader question. To do this, the engineer must have a good understanding of economic issues, |
and must be aware of the importance of good interaction with the manufacturing, construction, and financing elements of a project. Traditionally, the oil companies took care of this integration, but the downsizing in the industry has limited its ability to do this, and increased the reliance on the engineers, suppliers and contractors to produce their own integrated solutions.
As engineers, we have to meet this challenge and make the necessary arrangements and associations to be able to understand and solve the broad issues, namely how to meet or exceed the return on investment criteria posed by our Clients. The oil companies, on the other hand, must be willing to define the real questions and the technical and economic acceptance criteria, without pre-conceiving the solution, determining the allowable pricing of parts of this solution, and practicing a detached project management style. This way all parties benefit, and smart ideas can be rewarded for what they are worth in the context of the whole investment. In this issue we are proud to announce two initiatives that are in line with this thinking. One is the TOPS joint venture, the other is INTECs new office in The Netherlands. We will keep you posted on how these ventures fare and whether we are successful in demonstrating (and be rewarded for) our initiatives.
W. J. Timmermans |
|
| |
||
| Subsea News |
|
Shell Offshore, GOM
Since early 1995, INTEC has been supporting Shells efforts from system evaluation to field development and installation of their deep subsea fields. Shells move to produce oil and gas in Gulf of Mexico deepwater has driven a fast-paced need for new technology developments and state-of-the-art feasibility studies including diverless/guidelineless tree and workover systems and long distance flowline systems designed to mitigate hydrate, paraffin and high pressure well containment problems. System designs were generated to also minimize or schedule CAPEX and OPEX costs for maximum return on investment. New developments include deepwater reeled pipe-in-pipe insulated flowlines, continuous high pressure subsea choking, daisy chain linking of satellite wells and implementation of protected derated flowlines. Standard analytical building blocks have evolved between INTEC and Shell to streamline the system design process and maintain focus on emerging technology challenges.
The latest ventures into deepwater have taken subsea technology to a higher level of development and reduced the associated risks of deepwater production of oil and gas fields.
Deepstar IIA Report Completed - Gulf of Mexico Deepwater
100 Regulatory
Due to the effort of senior staff such as Kerry Kirkland and Bill Beran, INTEC has served as the Project Coordinator/Technical Advisor and performed a number of the funded technical projects in Phase IIA. For example, Pete Lang produced a study on Subsea Chemical Distribution Systems (CTR A301), Ron Tucker completed a report on insulated flowlines (CTR A601), and a Subsea Production Systems Report (CTR A802-2) was compiled by Kerry, Bill Clark and Eric Gerberding. The overall Executive Summary and Committee Overview Report to preface Phase III (CTR A1102) was created by Doug Hendricks. This report incorporates 22 final and 40 draft reports from 68 studies executed during the Phase IIA program.
Phase III commenced in February, 1996. Kerry will continue his efforts to advance the DeepStar program. Phase III is a $4.5 Million project scheduled for a two year term. At present, there are 17 oil companies and 15 service companies involved in DeepStar III.
Presentation Capabilities
Dee is our authority on Photo Shop. With this program, Dee can take CD copied photos, enhance them by PC and import into Power Point to create excellent presentation material.
Kim and Jeff have created 3-D models and animation to beautifully communicate complex concepts such as subsea production equipment, field development layouts, installation procedures and operation/maintenance procedures. The work capitalizes on the power of visual communication and the resources we have in house. What next? Maybe virtual reality in a subsea domain.
|
| |
||
| |
||
New Awards This Past Quarter
|
INTEC Anniversaries
Two employees reach tenure milestones with INTEC:
Gene Mullee celebrated ten years on February 10, 1996
INTEC just wouldnt be the same without either of you, congratulations and thanks for the many contributions you have made to INTECs success. |
|||
| |
||
| INTEC Engineering, Inc. Intercontinental Building 15600 JFK Boulevard, 9th Floor Houston, TX 77032, USA tel: (281) 987-0800 Primary Fax: (281) 987-3838 Admin Fax: (281) 987-2002 e-mail: info@intec-hou.com |
![]() |
INTEC Engineering (SEA) SDN. BHD. Suite 12.2, 12th Floor Menara Aik Hua Changkat Raja Chulan 50200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Tel: +60 (3) 202-2488 Fax: +60 (3) 202-3488 e-mail: info@intec-mal.com.my |
![]() |
INTEC Engineering B.V. Poortweg 14 2612 PA Delft, The Netherlands P.O. Box 3178 2601 DD Delft, The Netherlands tel: +31 (15) 256-5675 FAX: +31 (015) 256-0194 email: info@intec-delft.com |
![]() | INTEC Engineering S.R.L. Lavalle #465 Planta Baja 1047, Buenos Aires Argentina tel: +54 (1) 14 327-4120 FAX: +54 (1) 14 327-4121 email: info@intec-hou.com |
![]() |
INTEC-egis Adelaide House 200, Adelaide Terrace Perth, Western Australia 6000 tel: + 61 (8) 9220 9374 FAX: + 61 (8) 9325 9897 email: info@intec-hou.com |